🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I historically steered clear of significant use of chance during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be shaped by player choice instead of pure luck. Recently, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Observing an Improvised Tool

A well-known podcast showcases a DM who frequently calls for "fate rolls" from the players. This involves picking a specific dice and defining potential outcomes tied to the roll. It's fundamentally no different from consulting a random table, these get invented in the moment when a character's decision lacks a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, primarily because it appeared novel and provided a change from my usual habits. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated dynamic between planning and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

An Emotional Story Beat

At a session, my party had concluded a massive fight. Afterwards, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a pair—had lived. Rather than choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one succumbed; on a 10+, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a deeply poignant sequence where the party discovered the remains of their companions, forever united in death. The group performed funeral rites, which was uniquely significant due to previous character interactions. As a parting gesture, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were strangely restored, containing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's contained spell was exactly what the group required to resolve another major situation. It's impossible to plan such perfect coincidences.

Honing DM Agility

This incident caused me to question if randomization and making it up are truly the essence of tabletop RPGs. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Players reliably excel at ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to pivot effectively and fabricate content on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a great way to practice these skills without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The trick is to apply them for low-stakes circumstances that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. As an example, I would not employ it to establish if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to figure out whether the PCs arrive moments before a critical event unfolds.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also serves to maintain tension and foster the feeling that the adventure is responsive, shaping according to their decisions in real-time. It prevents the sense that they are merely actors in a DM's sole narrative, thereby bolstering the shared aspect of storytelling.

Randomization has historically been part of the game's DNA. The game's roots were filled with random tables, which suited a game focused on dungeon crawling. While contemporary D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the only path.

Striking the Right Balance

There is absolutely no issue with being prepared. However, it's also fine nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Direction is a major part of a DM's role. We use it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to give some up, even when doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of recommendation is this: Have no fear of letting go of your plan. Try a little improvisation for inconsequential outcomes. The result could create that the organic story beat is far more memorable than anything you could have pre-written on your own.